The recorder "frightened" the lost 180,000 yuan jewelry.

A few days ago, Ms. Zhong lost her jewelry worth 180,000 yuan. Through the surveillance video, Zhao suspected the cleaning worker Zhao, but the other party denied it. And because this is a lost property, it is a private prosecution case and the police cannot take an investigation.

Ms. Zhong was on fire. By negotiating with Zhao, she secretly stuffed a voice recorder under the bed of Zhao’s family.

Lost jewelry worth 180,000 yuan

The suspected stalker in the surveillance denied

At noon on October 9th, Ms. Zhong drove to work, took a jewelry bag out of the bag, and prepared to put it in a friend's safe. There are 3 gold rings and a gold necklace in the jewelry bag. There is a diamond on the necklace, with a total value of about 180,000 yuan.

Ms. Chung was hungry and stopped to buy a loaf of bread. But she forgot the jewellery bag on her lap. When the person came out of the car, the jewellery bag fell out of the car.

Two hours later, Ms. Chung remembered that the jewelry was gone and rushed to the police. Lishui Liandu Public Security Bureau Vientiane police station to check the nearby surveillance, and finally locked, smashed into the suspected jewelry of Ms. Zhong, a worker of a cleaning company, Zhao.

However, Zhao insisted that he did not pick up the jewelry. The police asked her family members and there was no result. Ms. Chung said that if the returnee returned the jewelry, she would pay 10,000 yuan.

After the manager of the cleaning company was informed, he inquired about a number of workers. Many people have reported that Zhao has been to jewelry, but she just does not recognize it.

Lost property is a private prosecution case

The police could not investigate

Ms. Chung originally thought that even if you don’t admit it, there is monitoring, and the police must check it out. However, she did not expect that the case could not be investigated by the police because the lost jewelry was a lost property and it was a private prosecution case.

Wu Jinjin, director of Zhejiang Shihui Law Firm, analyzed the case. The situation of losing property is divided into two categories: “lost objects” and “forgotten things”. Although the plot and nature of the two are different, one thing is the same. All the property owners need to sue in court.

Wu said that the jewelry lost by Ms. Zhong is a lost thing from the plot.

However, the lawsuit to the court, the procedures are many, the time is long, Ms. Zhong is impatient. She thought of a way.

The owner makes a recording pen

Make the sanitation workers not break

On the evening of October 14, Ms. Zhong took a recording pen in her pocket and went to Zhao’s rental office. What she wants is to talk about it first, and if not, then adopt an extreme approach.

Ms. Zhong proposed to Zhao a reward of 18,000 yuan, and finally added 40,000 yuan, only to return the jewellery. Zhao still insisted that "nothing was reached."

Ms. Zhong pressed her heart to the fire, and Zhao was not prepared. The recording pen in the recording state was quietly placed under the bed of Zhao’s family. According to her prediction, Zhao and his wife will definitely discuss this matter, and the recording will obtain evidence.

On the evening of the next day, Ms. Zhong came to Zhao’s home again on the grounds that “something fell.” Zhao’s attitude remained the same. Ms. Zhong took the recording pen from under the bed in person: "I have given you a chance. Here are the recordings of the couples of the couple, we will see you in court!"

When she got home, Ms. Chung discovered that the recorder was out of power. In the early morning of October 16, she was sorting out the recordings and received a call from the police station: Zhao had returned the jewelry to the store. Ms. Zhong rushed to the police station and after checking it out, she found that all the jewelry she lost was inside.

The policeman who handled the case told Ms. Zhong that at 11 o'clock in the middle of the night on October 15th, Zhao took the jewelry and came to the police station to ask the police. If the jewelry was returned, it would be fine, and then the jewelry was returned.

Yesterday, the company where Zhao was located said that Zhao had not recovered after he had seized huge amounts of property for a long time. Finally, he returned the owner in a passive situation. The company was prepared to expel him according to the relevant system.

Lawyer

Inappropriate evidence, infringement of the privacy of others

Although the process of retrieving jewelry can be described as twists and turns, Ms. Zhong is fortunate. If Zhao’s psychological quality is “strong”, he still refuses to return the jewelry?

Ms. Zhao said that after she compiled the recordings, she found that Zhao and his wife did discuss the topic of jewelry, which is a favorable evidence.

However, Wu Jinjin’s lawyer reminded that taking the way of recording and collecting evidence in the residence of others violated the privacy rights of others and was not supported by law.

Linen Cotton Fabrics

Linen Cotton Fabric,Sailing Vessel Fabri,Wash Painting Pattern Fabric,Dark Blue Fabric

Shaoxing City Jiaren Textile Co., ltd. , https://www.jiarentextile.com